A place where you understand the telescopes: the first Hungarian http://www.makszutov.hu astroimag

Community Forum Forum Home Forum Rules FAQ Groups Blogs Events Current Events All Future beadaholique Events Event Archive Gallery Videos User's Guide Mailing List Mailing List Etiquette Rules FAQ Search Search Archive Newsletters Astronomical newsletters Friends Forum Search Search this site Search the blogs Information
Dear amateur friends! As fate would have it that I can I can start shooting. My brother in law made adapter to the camera (Nikon D40) so we can take it up to fix the telescope. The first test image could be seen nothing. The second floor was a large white disk. I thought I must focus. beadaholique I wrapped the focuser, and started shooting and I instantly became a better picture, but there was a small wrinkle. The picture could be seen nothing but a large white disk centered in the secondary mirror of the support legs. Be that as we tried, we got the same picture. Eyepiece cross in could produce acceptable images, but we do not want to take pictures okulárprojekciós method. Wherever you read the information in this area, provided that we all just need to fix the machine to the telescope and go to the photo. Or can not have been anything. So now I have the biggest problem is how to ultimately beadaholique create normal images. The other is how to change the zoom level? Because if a gázködöt want to take pictures, you should of course LM great, but if a tiny galaxy MCG, you may want to think small LM anyway. Ideas? John Smith (Janicsillagasz) Posts: 416 Joined: 2009th September 22, Tuesday 13:13 to others Acknowledgements: beadaholique Acknowledgements 11 others: 15
Silly question, but is it just the vase rogzitettetek the telescope? (Sorry) otherwise is probably just as many that do not result in the focal plane of the focuser can not be rolled inwards. Try something binoculars on the machine beadaholique and the closer the subject of taking pictures, that there can be sharp stand (if closer to the object, it should be anyways away from the mirror to the focal plane), then you can also try a tavolabbakkal ever. Or simply measured in terms of where the focal plane is the surface of the mirror at segedtukron depleted, where is the tube from the edge of the focal plane. So, there has to be inside of the camera in the sensing ... Yes you can change the magnification is not (possible, but not really worth), beadaholique it will have you focus your binoculars ed. The shorter focal Azerbaijani is good because it is easier for the recording routed over several minutes exposure time. - Peter Molnar mpt (MPT) Posts: 1210 Joined: 2009th , September 7 Monday 9:46 to others Acknowledgements: Acknowledgements 38 others 170
I do not know what kind of telescope - 150/1200-es from the image Dobson telescope these conditions: you have a lot of trouble if you want to take pictures. The tube sizing is not such that the primary focus sharply able to stand, so the pipe end (where the primary mirror is) about 4-5 cm should be cut off, or be that much farther into the mirror. Up without Másrésről hour machine. You can capture the moon. The resulting image size (as Peter wrote) Barlow lens / focal reducer can provide reduced. The former of the planets, the latter most useful for deep-sky images. In any case, you may want to read the Digital Photography beadaholique Secrets deep-sky c. article series. The aláirásomban is a link where you can subscribe to it.
A place where you understand the telescopes: the first Hungarian http://www.makszutov.hu astroimagers Community Portal: http://asztrofoto.hu Magpie Paladin (SzarkaLevente) Posts: 590 Joined: beadaholique 2009th , September 7 Monday 21:26 Acknowledgments others: 0 Acknowledgements others: 88
SkyWatcher Dobson 150/1200-as me the last time a trial could take a picture, so I think you should go to the photo adapter for navigation. That said, I just odaszorítottam lens Canon EOS300D frame without the telescope eyepiece and shot a series. beadaholique But it is difficult to focus the case, it just looked really good on the computer if it worked or not.
I do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to comment populations. Rumpf Barnabas beadaholique (rumpfbarna) Posts: 131 Joined: 2009th , Dec. 17 others Thursday beadaholique 23:40 Acknowledgments: Acknowledgments six others: 0
One more thing! This test shots I made it to the eyepiece holder "adapter" was not above the telescope. Probably, therefore, I understand beadaholique the focus plane. You might need a different adapter barkácsolnotok ... Rumpf Barnabas (rumpfbarna) Posts: 131 Joined: 2009th , Dec. 17 others Thursday 23:40 Acknowledgments: Acknowledgments six others: 0
rumpfbarna wrote: I have the 150/1200-as SkyWatcher Dobson managed to take a picture the other day of a test, so I think you should go to the photo adapter for navigation. That said, I just odaszorítottam